Just like the tobacco companies did in the 30’s and 40’s for smoking, the veterinary profession started deceiving cat owners in the 50’s to believe that declawing was humane and ok to do to a cat.
The veterinary associations and pro-declaw veterinarians are still perpetuating these lies and deception about declawing so that they can keep making money from this very inhumane procedure.
“In the 1930s and 1940s, smoking became the norm for both men and women in the United States, and a majority of physicians smoked. At the same time, there was rising public anxiety about the health risks of cigarette smoking. One strategic response of tobacco companies was to devise advertising referring directly to physicians. As ad campaigns featuring physicians developed through the early 1950s, tobacco executives used the doctor image to assure the consumer that their respective brands were safe.
These advertisements also suggested that the individual physicians’ clinical judgment should continue to be the arbiter of the harms of cigarette smoking even as systematic health evidence accumulated. However, by 1954, industry strategists deemed physician images in advertisements no longer credible in the face of growing public concern about the health evidence implicating cigarettes. ” * Story about how doctors deceived the public about smoking
Declawing started in the 50’s by an unethical vet named Dr Misener. The AVMA celebrated him as a doctor who invented a “humane procedure to declaw cats.” Here is what the AVMA said about Misener in his obituary on the AVMA website.
Here is a story from 1952 in the AVMA’s JAVMA.
This is the Resco torture tool that many vets still use to amputate the toe bones on a cat and that the AVMA calls “humane.” They put the cat’s toe bone inside the cutting part of it and crush off the bone.
Here is just one of the sad stories about the millions of cats who have been horrifically declawed by this rescoe trimmer method. Ozmin the declawed cat
AVMA Declawing video NYSVMS Propaganda that they sent to legislators
Here are just some of the deceptive advertising for declawing from New York veterinarian’s websites.
This was on the NYSVMS President’s website saying that laser declaw is more humane (yet she also offers the old school less humane way at her practice) NYSVMS President and declawing
This is from an AAHA hospital, Blue Springs Animal Hospital in Missouri. Their front desk person says to first time cat owners who ask about declawing is that there are no negative consequences for a cat to be declawed, except that they should be indoor cats. They say their laser seal nerve endings and cauterizes and “makes for a nice procedure for these guys.” They say they do “countless declaws” there. They tell a first time cat owner that the reason most people declaw is for scratching kids, furniture, or tearing up a leather couch. When a first time cat owner asks the vet tech that has been doing that for 18 yrs how they do it and if it is inhumane, she says, “it is like taking off the first knuckle in your finger but in a cat, that is all claw so that’s what they are removing and there is no long term damage to their health by doing that.” When a first time cat owner asks what’s best, 2 or 4 paw declaw, she says that they “prefer to just do the front but if your cat uses it’s back feet to get away from you and ends up scratching you, that can be an issue if you have elderly people or children”, but that the cat can’t defend themselves so they must stay inside. Never once did they suggest the humane alternatives like trimming nails or
From Pet Day Surgery veterinary practice in PA. Pet Day Surgery
Here’s another vet practice in Ohio that says it is best to declaw a kitten when it is young. They even say their four paw declaw amputations are for people with thin skin, health issues, or those in a nursing home. Urbana Vet Clinic